A five-rung maturity ladder for marketing data — and why most teams are trying to climb rung 4 before they've stabilised rung 2.
Role Framework developed from 12 years working across analytics, product, and strategy roles
Each level solves a specific problem. Skipping one doesn't make a team faster — it makes every level above it unreliable.
Fix the foundation before anything else — if it's lying to you, everything built on top of it is too.
This is where most teams live. It's solid ground — it's just not the finish line.
You stop optimising for the cheapest click and start optimising for the most valuable customer. Harder to build — worth every bit of the effort.
Marketing stops being a cost centre and starts walking into budget conversations with evidence. Most CMOs want to be here — fewer actually are.
The infrastructure decisions made at Levels 1–4 determine whether this level is ever realistic.
The same five levels, mapped against business impact and core capabilities.
The teams that move fastest aren't the ones with the biggest budgets — they're the ones who resist the temptation to skip levels.
Tracking, consent, and clean pipelines.
Data science and marketing actually working together — not just handing files back and forth.
Getting finance and marketing to agree on what proof of growth actually looks like.
The groundwork from Levels 1–4 determines whether autonomy is ever realistic.
Let's talk
Tell me your biggest data or AI bottleneck and I'll send you how I'd approach it — the same way I worked this problem. No résumé dump, no pitch. Just a useful conversation.
Start the conversation →